An all-in-one hacking tool to remotely exploit Android devices using ADB and Metasploit-Framework to get a Meterpreter session.
6k
Stars
836
Forks
2
Open issues
3
Contributors
AI Analysis
PhoneSploit Pro is a specialized penetration testing tool for Android devices that automates exploitation via ADB and Metasploit Framework to obtain remote Meterpreter sessions. It is designed for security professionals and penetration testers conducting authorized security assessments on Android devices with exposed ADB ports—not a general-purpose tool, and not intended for casual users or those without legitimate authorization.
Inferred from signals mentioned in the README (tests, CI, type safety) — not a review of the actual code.
AI's overall editorial judgment — not an average of the bars above, can weigh other factors too.
PhoneSploit Pro automates ADB and Metasploit exploitation of Android devices with open debug ports
PhoneSploit Pro is a Python-based automation wrapper that chains ADB and Metasploit-Framework to achieve one-click Meterpreter sessions on Android devices exposing TCP port 5555. It targets security researchers, CTF participants, and hobbyist pentesters who want to assess Android device exposure without memorizing complex ADB or msfvenom command syntax. Its ~6,000 stars and 832 forks suggest meaningful interest in the offensive security community, though the tool's real-world utility is bounded by the narrow attack surface it exploits: open ADB over TCP, which requires either prior misconfiguration or physical access to enable.
Created in December 2022 as an evolution of older PhoneSploit scripts, it adds Metasploit integration to an already-understood ADB exploitation pattern that has circulated in the security community since at least 2018.
Growth appears driven by YouTube tutorials, TikTok security content, and inclusion in hacking tool collections like Z4nzu/hackingtool. The audience is predominantly beginners and script-kiddies attracted to the 'one-click' framing. Sustained but slow star accumulation (~25/week as of mid-2026) suggests steady discovery rather than viral or community-driven momentum.
Adoption not verified in professional or enterprise contexts. Usage appears concentrated among learners, CTF players, and hobbyists based on README framing and typical audience for similar tools. No documented case studies, CVE research integrations, or corporate security team usage found in available metadata.
Likely a menu-driven Python CLI that shells out to `adb` and `msfconsole`/`msfvenom` binaries. Appears to wrap subprocess calls rather than using Python ADB or Metasploit APIs directly, based on the README's dependency list and feature descriptions. Multi-device selection via ANDROID_SERIAL environment variable suggests straightforward subprocess orchestration.
not documented in README
Last push was 2026-05-31, approximately 26 days before analysis date. This indicates active maintenance. The project has a versioned release history (badge present) and has been maintained for over 3.5 years, which is a positive longevity signal for a tool in this category.
ADOPT IF: you are doing authorized Android device security testing, CTF challenges, or lab exercises involving ADB-exposed devices and want to avoid manually constructing msfvenom payloads and ADB command sequences. AVOID IF: you are doing professional penetration testing or red teaming where tool reliability, evasion, and auditability matter, or if you expect to target devices that do not already have ADB-over-TCP enabled. MONITOR IF: you follow Android security tooling and want to see whether the project expands beyond the ADB-over-TCP attack vector to broader Android assessment capabilities.
Independent dimensions
Mainstream potential
2/10
Technical importance
3/10
Adoption evidence
2/10
- Extremely narrow attack surface: the core exploit path requires ADB TCP port 5555 to be open, which is not the default on modern Android devices and requires deliberate enablement or a compromised prior state.
- Legal and ethical risk: the 'one-click hacking' framing and broad distribution make misuse likely; users with malicious intent could use this tool to exploit devices they do not own, creating legal exposure.
- Dependency on external tools: reliability depends on compatible versions of adb, Metasploit, and msfvenom; upstream changes can silently break functionality with no documented test suite to catch regressions.
- Payload detection: modern Android devices and security software are increasingly likely to detect or block standard Metasploit APK payloads, limiting practical effectiveness even in authorized tests.
- Audience skew: the dominant user base appears to be beginners, which means community bug reports and contributions may lack the depth needed to sustain long-term technical quality.
Likely to continue as a niche beginner-oriented tool with slow, steady star growth. Unlikely to expand significantly into professional security workflows given the narrow ADB attack vector and the absence of signals toward deeper Android assessment capabilities.
Newsletter
Get analyses like this every Monday
Free weekly digest of the most interesting open-source discoveries.
Languages
Information
- Language
- Python
- License
- GPL-3.0
- Last updated
- 1mo ago
- Created
- 43mo ago
- Analyzed with
- anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5
Stars over time
Contributors over time
Top 100 contributors only — repos with more will plateau at 100.
Top contributors
Recent releases
Similar repos
zalexdev/strykerapp
StrykerOSS is a free, open-source mobile penetration testing suite for rooted...
threat9/routersploit
RouterSploit is an open-source exploitation framework specifically designed for...
hahwul/MobileHackersWeapons
MobileHackersWeapons is a curated directory of security and penetration testing...
| Repository | Stars | Week Δ | Language | Score | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
6k | +27 | Python | 7/10 | 1mo ago |
|
|
1k | — | Java | 7/10 | 23h ago |
|
|
13.2k | — | Python | 6/10 | 2mo ago |
|
|
1.4k | — | Python | 7/10 | 16h ago |
|
|
1.3k | — | Ruby | 6/10 | 4mo ago |
|
|
78.2k | — | Python | 5/10 | 4mo ago |
Metasploit is the underlying engine PhoneSploit Pro wraps. Metasploit is far more capable and used professionally, but requires command knowledge. PhoneSploit Pro trades flexibility for ease of use in this specific Android ADB scenario.
RouterSploit targets embedded/IoT network devices with a similarly menu-driven interface. It has broader scope and more modular design, and is more referenced in professional assessments. Comparable audience overlap.
A meta-collection that likely includes or links to PhoneSploit Pro. It serves a similar beginner audience but is a launcher/aggregator rather than a focused tool, making direct comparison limited.
SploitScan focuses on CVE-based vulnerability scanning rather than device exploitation. Narrower overlap; different threat model and intended user.
Another aggregator repo with similar star count. Comparable audience but no unique technical contribution; PhoneSploit Pro has more focused, original tooling.
