Building 70 Projects ranging from beginner to advanced so anyone can — learn from, build upon, use as a reference, or even copy directly. Gamified Cybersecurity learning 👇
AI Analysis
A curated collection of 70 cybersecurity projects organized by difficulty tier (Foundations through Advanced) designed to teach practical security skills through hands-on coding, complemented by certification roadmaps and learning resources. It serves as a self-directed learning platform and portfolio-building tool specifically for people pursuing cybersecurity careers, from beginners with no programming experience to intermediate practitioners. Best suited for career-changers, students prepa...
Inferred from signals mentioned in the README (tests, CI, type safety) — not a review of the actual code.
AI's overall editorial judgment — not an average of the bars above, can weigh other factors too.
Curated cybersecurity project collection with 70 hands-on exercises and learning roadmaps for students and career-changers
A GitHub-based learning repository hosting 70 cybersecurity projects across four difficulty tiers (Foundations, Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced), paired with certification roadmaps and resource guides. Built for self-taught learners, bootcamp students, and career transitioners. The Foundations tier explicitly targets people with no prior coding experience. Adoption appears concentrated in early-career learners; real-world production usage is not documented.
Repository created November 2025, reached 3,237 stars by June 2026 (approximately 7 months). Organized around tiered project difficulty and certification pathways. Appears to be an educational complement to CertGames platform (mentioned as sponsor). Growth has been rapid relative to age but repository remains young.
Strong recent velocity: 194 stars in last 7 days (as of 2026-06-21), 3,237 total in ~7 months, 431 forks. Growth trajectory suggests appeal to learning-focused audience. Similar repositories (90DaysOfCyberSecurity, h4cker) have significantly higher star counts (16k–28k) but are also older; this project's per-month growth rate appears competitive for educational content.
Adoption not verified. Repository is explicitly educational/learning-focused rather than production tool. No documentation of deployment in organizations, enterprises, or formal training programs. Mentions CertGames sponsorship but scale/nature of that relationship unclear. Appears designed as reference material and learning aid, not as operational software.
README indicates single-file project structure for Foundations tier with heavy inline comments and Numpy-style docstrings. Describes code as 'production-quality' with 'beginner-level explanations.' Only 34 of claimed 70 projects have full source code publicly available per badge. Likely organized as modular Python scripts rather than unified framework. Actual implementation details not verifiable from README alone.
Not documented in README. No mention of test suites, CI/CD, or validation workflows.
Last push 2026-06-21 (7 days prior to analysis date 2026-06-28), indicating active maintenance. Project is young (7 months) so early-stage stability uncertain. Repository shows ongoing work ('Currently building: Self-Hosted Shodan Clone'). Issue and pull-request activity not specified in metadata provided.
ADOPT IF: You are learning cybersecurity from zero (especially Foundations tier), need hands-on projects paired with explanation, or seek structured career roadmaps. Code quality appears solid for educational purposes. AVOID IF: You need production-ready tooling, formal certification tracking, automated testing, or documented enterprise deployment. Project is learning material, not operational software. MONITOR IF: You want to track how this evolves as a learning platform—the 34/70 code availability gap suggests either ongoing development or aspirational scope; clarity will emerge in next 6 months.
Independent dimensions
Mainstream potential
3/10
Technical importance
5/10
Adoption evidence
2/10
- Only 48% of promised 70 projects have public source code; remaining 36 projects not yet available, creating scope uncertainty
- Adoption limited to self-directed learners; no evidence of formal curriculum integration or corporate training use
- Young project (7 months); long-term maintenance commitment unproven, especially after initial star-driven growth phase
- No test coverage or CI/CD documentation; code quality claims based on README description, not independently verifiable
- AGPL-3.0 license may create friction for some organizational or commercial learning contexts
Project likely continues as educational resource with incremental project additions. May see increased adoption if integrated into bootcamp curricula or certification prep ecosystems. Unlikely to become operational security tool; more likely to stabilize as niche but durable learning collection alongside competitors.
Newsletter
Get analyses like this every Monday
Free weekly digest of the most interesting open-source discoveries.
Languages
Information
- Website
- https://certgames.com
- Language
- Python
- License
- AGPL-3.0
- Last updated
- 16h ago
- Created
- 8mo ago
- Analyzed with
- anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5
Stars over time
Contributors over time
Top 100 contributors only — repos with more will plateau at 100.
Open issues
Top contributors
Recent releases
No releases published yet.
Similar repos
farhanashrafdev/90DaysOfCyberSecurity
A structured 90-day self-paced cybersecurity study plan covering foundational...
Ignitetechnologies/Mindmap
This repository provides a curated collection of cybersecurity mind maps that...
The-Art-of-Hacking/h4cker
A comprehensive, curated collection of cybersecurity resources, scripts, tools,...
microsoft/Security-101
Security-101 is an educational curriculum comprising 8 structured lessons on...
onlurking/awesome-infosec
A curated index of infosec courses, labs, and training resources (MOOCs,...
| Repository | Stars | Week Δ | Language | Score | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3.9k | +171 | Python | 7/10 | 16h ago |
|
|
17.3k | — | — | 7/10 | 4mo ago |
|
|
9k | — | — | 6/10 | 2mo ago |
|
|
28.3k | — | Jupyter Notebook | 8/10 | 2w ago |
|
|
6.7k | — | HTML | 8/10 | 7mo ago |
|
|
5.7k | — | — | 7/10 | 8mo ago |
Higher adoption (16.9k stars vs 3.2k), longer history. Both are structured learning paths. This project differentiates via code-first approach and tiered difficulty; competitor appears more reading/concept-forward.
Higher adoption (27.9k stars), Jupyter Notebook format. Appears more reference-oriented; this project emphasizes hands-on executable projects with learning materials embedded.
8.9k stars, likely concept mapping focused. Complements rather than competes; serves different learning modality.
Formal authoritative resources; this project serves as practical scaffolding around those concepts rather than replacement.