The Ultimate Unified Hosts file for protecting your network, computer, smartphones and Wi-Fi devices against millions of bad web sites. Protect your children and family from gaining access to bad web sites and protect your devices and pc from being infected with Malware or Ransomware.
AI Analysis
Ultimate Hosts Blacklist is a curated, unified hosts file containing over 900,000 malicious domains and IPs, updated daily to protect networks and devices against malware, ransomware, and unwanted content. It is purpose-built for system administrators, network operators, and privacy-conscious users who want network-level blocking via hosts files or DNS servers, not for general-purpose web browsing. This tool is specialized for defensive network administration rather than end-user applications.
Inferred from signals mentioned in the README (tests, CI, type safety) — not a review of the actual code.
AI's overall editorial judgment — not an average of the bars above, can weigh other factors too.
Actively maintained unified hosts blacklist aggregating 900K+ domains, competing in crowded DNS filtering market
Ultimate Hosts Blacklist (UHB) is a curated hosts file aggregator updated daily, combining data from multiple sources into variants ranging from 922K domains to 1M+ entries. It targets users on Windows, Linux, macOS, and IoT devices seeking network-level ad/malware blocking via hosts files or custom DNS servers (88.198.70.38/39). Adoption appears modest relative to market leaders but consistent within the hosts-file community.
Project created July 2017, positioned as consolidation layer for existing blocklists. Maintains an organizational structure across GitHub repos (blacklist, whitelist, dev-center) suggesting institutional intent rather than solo maintenance.
GitHub stars show steady but slow growth (1,592 stars, 174 forks as of 2026-07-01; +1 star in last 7 days). Last commit 2026-07-01 indicates active maintenance. Appears to have plateaued relative to category leaders (StevenBlack/hosts: 30K stars; hagezi/dns-blocklists: 24K stars), suggesting it occupies a stable niche rather than experiencing expansion.
Adoption not verified in README. No user testimonials, deployment counts, or organizational endorsements documented. README references official mirror (hosts.ubuntu101.co.za) and custom DNS infrastructure, suggesting operational deployment, but scale unknown. Modest GitHub engagement (174 forks, single discussion/issue channels) does not confirm production adoption breadth.
Likely aggregates multiple external blocklist sources via Shell scripts, outputs in hosts-file format (127.0.0.1 binding) and hosts.deny format, plus consolidated 'superhosts.deny' variant containing 1M+ entries. README indicates daily regeneration pipeline with versioning (V2.3624.2026.07.01). Appears to coordinate via multi-repo GitHub org structure for blacklist curation, whitelist management, and infrastructure.
Not documented in README. No mention of validation methodology for false positive rates, domain accuracy, or DNS resolution testing.
Last push 2026-07-01 23:42:00 (current relative to analysis date 2026-07-02) indicates active maintenance within past 24 hours. Daily update schedule explicitly documented. Organized issue/discussion triage across multiple repos suggests structured stewardship. No signs of abandonment; consistency is the signal.
ADOPT IF: you require a pre-aggregated, actively updated hosts-file blocklist with 900K+ domain coverage, operate infrastructure where daily pull-based updates are feasible, and tolerate unverified real-world adoption metrics. AVOID IF: you need commercial SLA support, documented false-positive rates, or evidence of production scale. MONITOR IF: you are evaluating hosts-file consolidation layers and want to compare technical merit against StevenBlack/hosts or hectorm/hblock before committing to this project's smaller ecosystem.
Independent dimensions
Mainstream potential
3/10
Technical importance
5/10
Adoption evidence
2/10
- Adoption scale unverified; unclear how many production deployments rely on UHB vs. competing solutions or upstream sources directly.
- Test coverage not documented; risk of false positives in blocklists (overly aggressive blocking of legitimate domains) not addressed in README.
- Single organizational point of failure; if GitHub organization maintenance lapses, daily pipeline may break; no backup described.
- Competitive saturation; larger projects (StevenBlack, hagezi) may consolidate market share; unclear what UHB's unique value proposition is relative to alternatives.
- DNS server infrastructure (88.198.70.38/39) operated outside typical DNS provider commercial frameworks; reliability/SLA not documented.
Likely to remain a stable, actively maintained niche tool within the hosts-file community, sustaining daily updates and modest community engagement without significant growth. Growth rate suggests it will not challenge market leaders; hosts-file-based blocking is itself declining relative to DNS-native and proxy solutions.
Newsletter
Get analyses like this every Monday
Free weekly digest of the most interesting open-source discoveries.
Languages
Information
- Language
- Shell
- License
- MIT
- Last updated
- 16h ago
- Created
- 109mo ago
- Analyzed with
- anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5
Stars over time
Contributors over time
Top 100 contributors only — repos with more will plateau at 100.
Open issues
Blocklist Addition: apollogrouptvs.com apollogroups.tv apollogrouptv.cam apollogroupv.tv
False Positive | 188.114.97.2 (Phishing Army Blocklist Extended)
False Positive | mail.uni.edu.gt
0.0.0.0 does not work with IPv6.
False Positive | akamai.net
Top contributors
Recent releases
No releases published yet.
Similar repos
| Repository | Stars | Week Δ | Language | Score | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.6k | +1 | Shell | 7/10 | 16h ago |
|
|
30.7k | — | Python | 8/10 | 1d ago |
|
|
2.1k | — | HTML | 7/10 | 3d ago |
|
|
2k | — | Shell | 7/10 | 1w ago |
|
|
24.3k | — | Text | 8/10 | 1d ago |
|
|
1.3k | — | JavaScript | 7/10 | 2w ago |
20x larger on GitHub (30.6K vs 1.6K stars). Python-based with documented Ansible/Terraform integrations. Broader organizational backing and integration ecosystem. UHB differentiator unclear from README.
15x larger (24.1K stars). Positioned as DNS filter lists rather than hosts-file aggregator. Different consumption model (DNS-native vs hosts-file). UHB offers both but neither appears differentiated.
Comparable scale (1.9K stars). Shell-based hosts-file generator. Similar positioning; differentiation from UHB not evident in README.
HTML-based, smaller community (2.1K stars). May serve different user segment; comparison basis unclear.
Smallest comparable project (1.3K stars, JavaScript). Different implementation language; market positioning unknown.

