beelzebub-labs

beelzebub-labs/beelzebub

Go GPL-3.0 Security

A secure low code deception runtime framework, leveraging AI for System Virtualization.

2.1k stars
201 forks
active
GitHub +8 / week

2.1k

Stars

201

Forks

5

Open issues

18

Contributors

AI Analysis

Beelzebub is an open-source deception runtime framework that deploys LLM-powered decoy services across multiple protocols (SSH, HTTP, TCP, TELNET, MCP) to actively engage attackers and collect threat intelligence. It is purpose-built for security researchers, red teams, and enterprise security operations seeking to detect advanced threats and prompt injection attacks against AI agents—not a general-purpose application suitable for typical software development.

Security Security Tool Discovery value: 5/10
Documentation 8/10
Activity 9/10
Community 7/10
Code quality 8/10

Inferred from signals mentioned in the README (tests, CI, type safety) — not a review of the actual code.

Overall score 8/10

AI's overall editorial judgment — not an average of the bars above, can weigh other factors too.

llm-security honeypot deception-framework threat-intelligence prompt-injection-detection
Actively maintained Well documented Niche/specialized use case Popular Production ready
Deep Analysis · Based on README and public signals
2w ago

LLM-powered deception runtime for active threat collection across multiple protocols

Beelzebub is an open-source deception framework that deploys adaptive, AI-driven decoy services across SSH, HTTP, TCP, TELNET, and MCP protocols. It moves beyond passive honeypots by generating contextually realistic attacker interactions using LLMs (OpenAI, Ollama) to collect threat intelligence and detect prompt injection attacks. Built in Go with YAML-based low-code configuration, it targets security teams, threat researchers, and organizations needing active deception infrastructure. Adoption appears concentrated in specialized cybersecurity circles rather than mainstream DevOps.

Origin

Project created May 2022, emerging during increased interest in AI-augmented security tooling and honeypot modernization. Positioned in the deception/honeypot category alongside older tools like Sliver and newer Python-based offerings. The focus on LLM integration for realistic attacker engagement reflects 2023–2024 trends in AI-driven security.

Growth

Repository shows modest, steady growth: 2,067 stars with 19 gained in the last 7 days (as of June 2026) suggests a plateau after initial adoption. Similar projects (Decepticon: 4,513 stars; Sliver: 11,415 stars) indicate this tool remains in a smaller niche. Last push June 26, 2026 shows active maintenance. Inclusion in Awesome Go and availability of CI/codecov badges suggest serious engineering discipline, but star count and fork ratio (200 forks) indicate adoption remains specialized rather than broad.

In production

Adoption not verified in README. No case studies, known deployments, or public customer testimonials mentioned. Docker Compose, Kubernetes/Helm support, and Prometheus observability suggest production-readiness intent, but real-world deployment scale remains undocumented. RabbitMQ integration and memory limits indicate attention to operational concerns, but this alone does not confirm production adoption.

Code analysis
Architecture

Likely built as a modular runtime with pluggable deception services. README indicates YAML-based configuration engine, plugin system using `CommandPlugin` and `HTTPPlugin` interfaces, and multi-protocol support (SSH, HTTP, TCP, TELNET, MCP). Appears designed for extensibility without core modifications. Based on README, likely follows a service adapter pattern for protocol handling.

Tests

Codecov badge present and linked; README does not explicitly state coverage percentage. CI pipeline references suggest automated testing, but specific coverage targets not documented in README.

Maintenance

Last push June 26, 2026 (within 24 hours of evaluation date) indicates active maintenance. CI/CD badges functional. Go Report Card badge suggests code quality monitoring. Update frequency and issue resolution velocity not visible from metadata alone, but recent activity and badge presence indicate the project is not dormant. Likely maintained by small team or maintainer rather than large organization given star/fork ratios.

Honest verdict

ADOPT IF: you are a threat researcher, security team, or red team building internal deception infrastructure; you need low-code multi-protocol honeypots; you can manage LLM API costs and latency; and you operate in Go/Kubernetes environments. AVOID IF: you require commercial SLA support, have no in-house security ops, or need off-the-shelf turnkey deception platform with preset rules and no coding. MONITOR IF: you are evaluating honeypot modernization for enterprises; LLM-augmented deception approaches may mature and adoption may expand as security teams normalize AI-driven security tooling.

Independent dimensions

Mainstream potential

3/10

Technical importance

6/10

Adoption evidence

2/10

Risks
  • LLM dependency: runtime reliability tied to external API availability (OpenAI) or self-hosted model performance (Ollama); latency, cost, and prompt injection risk introduce operational complexity.
  • Narrow adoption base: 2,067 stars and modest fork count suggest limited real-world deployment footprint and smaller community for troubleshooting and plugins; risk of long-term maintenance sustainability if core team shrinks.
  • Lack of documented case studies: no public evidence of production scale deployment or customer success stories, making ROI and reliability difficult to assess for potential adopters.
  • Plugin ecosystem immaturity: extensibility model is defined, but limited visibility into third-party plugins or ecosystem health; lock-in risk if relying on custom plugins.
  • Competitive pressure from better-resourced projects: Sliver and Decepticon have higher star counts and likely larger communities; risk of feature/capability gaps or slower innovation pace.
Prediction

Likely to remain a specialized tool for security practitioners and threat researchers rather than achieve mainstream adoption. May see incremental adoption in organizations normalizing LLM-driven security workflows, but barriers to entry (LLM API management, operational complexity) and small current user base suggest it will stay niche-focused. Could accelerate if commercial vendors bundle or if open-source security operations becomes more standardized.

0 found this helpful

Newsletter

Get analyses like this every Monday

Free weekly digest of the most interesting open-source discoveries.

Languages

No language breakdown available.

Information

Language
Go
License
GPL-3.0
Last updated
11h ago
Created
51mo ago
Analyzed with
anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5

Stars over time

Loading…

No commit data available.

Contributors over time

Top 100 contributors only — repos with more will plateau at 100.

Loading…

Open issues

No open issues — clean slate.

Open pull requests

No open pull requests.

Top contributors

Contributor data not available yet.

Recent releases

No releases published yet.

Similar repos

PurpleAILAB

PurpleAILAB/Decepticon

Decepticon is an autonomous red-team agent powered by LLMs that automates...

4.6k Python Security
FunnyWolf

FunnyWolf/Viper

VIPER is a red team and adversary simulation platform designed for security...

BishopFox

BishopFox/sliver

Sliver is an open-source adversary emulation and red team command-and-control...

11.5k Go Security
vs. alternatives
Sliver (BishopFox)

Sliver (11,415 stars) is a mature C2 framework with broad adoption among red teams; Beelzebub focuses narrower on active deception and LLM-augmented responses rather than full C2 command & control. Different use case, not a direct replacement.

Decepticon (PurpleAILAB)

Decepticon (4,513 stars, Python) also integrates AI for deception. Beelzebub offers multi-protocol reach (SSH, TCP, TELNET, MCP) and low-code YAML config; Decepticon's feature set and protocol coverage not detailed in this context, but Python vs. Go suggests different deployment targets.

Viper (FunnyWolf)

Viper (5,116 stars) is a red team infrastructure tool; Beelzebub's deception-first posture and LLM focus distinguish it. Likely serve overlapping but distinct security practitioner communities.

Traditional honeypots (e.g., Cowrie, Dionaea)

Legacy honeypots are passive; Beelzebub's LLM-driven active engagement and low-code service definition offer faster iteration cycles and richer threat signal, though at cost of runtime complexity and LLM API dependency.

Commercial deception platforms

Beelzebub offers open-source, self-hosted alternative to proprietary deception-as-a-service platforms, with trade-offs in support and managed infrastructure for control and cost savings.