Hundreds of agent skills for medical research, including protocol design, data analysis, evidence insights, and academic writing.
1.3k
Stars
89
Forks
3
Open issues
7
Contributors
AI Analysis
A curated library of 550+ agent skills for medical research, enabling AI assistants to support clinical workflows across evidence synthesis, protocol design, data analysis, and academic writing. Built exclusively for biomedical researchers using frameworks like Claude Code and OpenClaw, this specialized toolkit is not a general-purpose utility—it targets domain experts conducting systematic literature reviews, genomic analysis, and clinical study design who need pre-built, audit-reviewed rese...
Inferred from signals mentioned in the README (tests, CI, type safety) — not a review of the actual code.
AI's overall editorial judgment — not an average of the bars above, can weigh other factors too.
Curated medical research agent skill library with 550+ pre-built workflows for Claude, OpenClaw, and SKILL.md platforms
Medical Research Agent Skills is a domain-specific skill repository created by AIPOCH, designed to augment AI agents (Claude Code, OpenClaw, Hermes) with 550+ pre-built capabilities for medical research workflows: literature discovery, protocol design, data analysis, and academic writing. Target audience is biomedical researchers who want to use AI agents without building skills from scratch. Adoption appears limited to early adopters in the AI-for-research space; no evidence of large-scale institutional deployment.
Repository created 2026-02-04; very recent project (4.5 months old at evaluation date). Emerged within a growing ecosystem of agent-skill libraries. Positioned as domain-specialized alternative to general agent-skill collections, with emphasis on medical research validation through proprietary 'MedSkillAudit' framework.
Gained 1,177 stars in ~4.5 months with 17 new stars in last 7 days. Growth rate appears moderate and decelerating slightly (early enthusiasm now settling to steady-state acquisition). README emphasizes star-gathering as indicator of active maintenance, suggesting growth is a marketing signal rather than organic adoption metric. Similar repos in ecosystem (K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills: 29,136 stars; VoltAgent/awesome-agent-skills: 26,199 stars) dwarf this project, indicating narrow positioning within broader agent-skills landscape.
Adoption not verified. README targets 'medical and biomedical researchers' but provides no case studies, deployment counts, citations, or institutional partnerships. No evidence of use in published research workflows. AIPOCH branding and social media links (X, LinkedIn, YouTube) present, but no quantitative adoption metrics. Lack of testimonials, integration announcements, or real-world use cases suggests early-stage community project rather than production deployment at scale.
Repository appears to be primarily a skill manifest and template collection rather than a monolithic codebase. Based on README, organized into five categories (Evidence Insights, Protocol Design, Data Analysis, Academic Writing, Other) with 554 total skills. Likely uses SKILL.md format for interoperability with Claude Code, Codex, Open Code, Hermes Agent, and OpenClaw. README mentions 'MedSkillAudit' framework and 'skill-auditor' tool as subdirectories, suggesting validation pipeline. Actual implementation quality of skills, dependency management, and code structure cannot be assessed from README alone.
Not documented in README. No mention of testing strategy, validation methodology beyond 'MedSkillAudit' audit framework (which appears to be a domain-specific review process rather than automated testing). Scope and rigor of MedSkillAudit framework not detailed in truncated README.
Last push 2026-06-15 (8 days before evaluation date); recent and active. Repository is 4.5 months old, so 'maintained' must be contextualized: project is young, not proven long-term. README explicitly requests stars as maintenance signal, suggesting developer is aware of attention as motivation. 80 forks is modest but not negligible for a niche repository. No fork activity, issue resolution time, or contributor count visible in metadata provided.
ADOPT IF: you are actively building medical research workflows with Claude Code, OpenClaw, or SKILL.md-compatible platforms, and you want pre-validated medical research templates rather than building from scratch. AVOID IF: you need production-grade validation, institutional support, or evidence of large-scale real-world deployment; or if your workflow is not aligned with the four documented categories (evidence insights, protocol design, data analysis, academic writing). MONITOR IF: you are evaluating AI-agent skill libraries for future adoption; this project may mature into a defensible niche, but current evidence is insufficient to recommend as primary solution for mission-critical research workflows.
Independent dimensions
Mainstream potential
3/10
Technical importance
5/10
Adoption evidence
2/10
- Adoption not verified beyond early adopter communities; no evidence of actual use in published research or institutional deployments
- Project is only 4.5 months old; long-term maintenance and roadmap stability unproven; growth rate appears to be slowing
- Medical research domain implies high stakes for accuracy and validation; reliance on proprietary, undocumented 'MedSkillAudit' framework raises questions about rigor and reproducibility of skill quality claims
- Likely dependency on evolving AI agent platforms (Claude Code, OpenClaw) whose stability and API compatibility is outside this project's control
- Positioned in highly crowded agent-skill ecosystem with much larger, better-funded competitors; may struggle to maintain differentiation as general-purpose agent frameworks mature
Project likely to remain a specialized, modest-scale community resource for medical researchers using AI agents. Growth will probably plateau unless adopted by major research institutions or integrated into broader research platforms. Vertical specialization (medical research) is defensible niche, but ecosystem maturation favors integrated solutions over standalone skill collections.
Newsletter
Get analyses like this every Monday
Free weekly digest of the most interesting open-source discoveries.
Languages
Information
- Website
- https://aipoch.com/agent-skills
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
- Last updated
- 7h ago
- Created
- 5mo ago
- Analyzed with
- anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5
Stars over time
Contributors over time
Top 100 contributors only — repos with more will plateau at 100.
Top contributors
Similar repos
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
Scientific Agent Skills is a collection of 148 ready-to-use skills and 100+...
Orchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs
A comprehensive open-source skills library providing 98 structured AI research...
VoltAgent/awesome-agent-skills
Awesome Agent Skills is a curated collection of 1,500+ skills for AI agent...
softaworks/agent-toolkit
Agent Toolkit is a curated collection of reusable skills for AI coding agents...
| Repository | Stars | Week Δ | Language | Score | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.3k | +61 | Python | 8/10 | 7h ago |
|
|
30.6k | — | Python | 8/10 | 2d ago |
|
|
10.6k | — | TeX | 7/10 | 3w ago |
|
|
27.7k | — | — | 8/10 | 1w ago |
|
|
2.2k | — | Python | 7/10 | 4mo ago |
|
|
2.8k | — | Stata | 7/10 | 21h ago |
24x larger star count (29,136 vs 1,177); broader scope (general scientific research vs. medical-specific); appears earlier in ecosystem establishment; adoption scale likely higher but specificity lower
22x larger (26,199 stars); generic agent-skill aggregator; not medical-specialized; broad visibility but no domain depth
8.5x larger (9,974 stars); TeX-based (different format/language); research-focused; likely academic audience overlap but different technical ecosystem
1.9x larger (2,295 stars); Stata-based (domain-specific statistics language); narrower audience; comparable positioning but established earlier
13x larger (15,814 stars); Python-based; non-medical; general agent skills; larger ecosystem reach but no vertical specialization