A tool to generate your GitHub summary card for profile README
3.6k
Stars
473
Forks
45
Open issues
30
Contributors
AI Analysis
This tool generates customizable GitHub profile summary cards (SVG visualizations) displaying repository statistics, language breakdowns, and contribution metrics for inclusion in profile READMEs. It serves GitHub users who want to showcase profile analytics visually, with particular appeal to those maintaining public portfolios. It is not a general analytics platform but a specialized profile decoration tool.
Inferred from signals mentioned in the README (tests, CI, type safety) — not a review of the actual code.
AI's overall editorial judgment — not an average of the bars above, can weigh other factors too.
GitHub Profile Summary Cards generates customizable SVG cards visualizing GitHub activity for profile READMEs.
A TypeScript web service that creates visual summary cards showing GitHub statistics (languages, commits, productivity patterns) in multiple themes. Primarily used by developers decorating personal GitHub profiles. The service operates via a public API endpoint and includes 15+ themes. Activity is steady but modest: 3,558 stars, 473 forks, last commit June 2026. Serves a defined niche (profile aesthetics) rather than competing with core analytics tools.
Created September 2020, inspired by tipsy/profile-summary-for-github. Emerged during a period of growing GitHub profile customization trends. Has maintained consistency over 5+ years without major pivots, suggesting stable, purpose-focused development.
Grew to ~3.5k stars and 470+ forks by 2026, but recent growth is minimal (5 stars in last 7 days as of June 2026). Growth likely peaked 2-3 years after launch; project appears to have reached equilibrium adoption within its niche rather than entering decline. Significantly smaller than category leaders (github-readme-stats: 79.7k stars) but larger than some specialized alternatives.
Public live API endpoint (github-profile-summary-cards.vercel.app) with demo page suggests active service operation. Widespread embedding in GitHub profiles is plausible but not quantified—no metrics provided on API call volume, user count, or documented corporate/organizational usage. Adoption not verified beyond assumed individual developer usage.
Likely built as a Node.js API service deployable to Vercel, based on public API endpoint URLs in README and TypeScript language designation. README does not detail backend architecture, database strategy, or scalability approach. Appears to render SVG cards server-side and serve them via URL parameters.
Not documented in README. GitHub Actions workflow badge indicates 'test-and-lint.yml' exists, but README does not specify coverage levels, testing frameworks, or test scope.
Last push June 23, 2026 (9 days before evaluation date) indicates active maintenance as of mid-2026. Conventional Commits badge suggests disciplined commit hygiene. No evidence of stalled issues or delayed releases in README, but issue/PR velocity not quantified. Project appears actively maintained rather than dormant, though update frequency not specified.
ADOPT IF: you want multiple pre-built, themed GitHub summary cards for a personal profile README with minimal setup—just copy a URL with your username. You value aesthetic customization and don't need advanced analytics. AVOID IF: you need API reliability guarantees, priority support, or integration with complex CI/CD workflows; this is a community project without SLA or commercial backing. You require server-side control or offline use. MONITOR IF: you are considering this for an organization or product—adoption metrics are opaque and service availability depends on Vercel's free tier continuity.
Independent dimensions
Mainstream potential
3/10
Technical importance
4/10
Adoption evidence
4/10
- No documented SLA or uptime commitment; API availability depends on Vercel free tier stability and maintainer's activity level.
- Adoption metrics are opaque; real usage volume, failure rates, and user count are not public, making reliability assessment difficult.
- GitHub API rate-limiting could affect service under high load; no caching or backoff strategy documented.
- Maintainer-dependent project with no visible succession planning; long maintenance hiatus could break public API without warning.
- Limited extensibility; adding new card types or themes requires repository contributions rather than configuration.
Likely to remain a stable, niche tool for personal GitHub profile decoration. Unlikely to gain significant adoption outside individual developers due to category saturation and lack of differentiation beyond themes. Maintenance may slow if maintainer's priorities shift, but project is not at risk of abandonment based on recent activity.
Newsletter
Get analyses like this every Monday
Free weekly digest of the most interesting open-source discoveries.
Languages
Information
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- MIT
- Last updated
- 2w ago
- Created
- 71mo ago
- Analyzed with
- anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5
Stars over time
Contributors over time
Top 100 contributors only — repos with more will plateau at 100.
Open issues
No open issues — clean slate.
Top contributors
Similar repos
rahuldkjain/github-profile-readme-generator
A web-based generator tool that creates GitHub profile README files with...
anuraghazra/github-readme-stats
GitHub Readme Stats is a serverless tool that generates dynamically rendered...
tipsy/profile-summary-for-github
Profile Summary is a web application that visualizes GitHub user profiles and...
| Repository | Stars | Week Δ | Language | Score | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3.6k | — | TypeScript | 7/10 | 2w ago |
|
|
24.3k | — | TypeScript | 7/10 | 9mo ago |
|
|
79.8k | — | JavaScript | 6/10 | 1w ago |
|
|
19.9k | — | Vue | 7/10 | 5mo ago |
|
|
1.7k | — | TypeScript | 8/10 | 3w ago |
79.7k stars vs. 3.5k; dominant market leader for GitHub stats visualization. Broader scope (stats cards, top languages, wakatime integration). Summary Cards is smaller, focused specifically on themed summary cards.
24.3k stars; full README generator tool with template system. Summary Cards is narrower (cards only) but offers more theme variety and direct API access.
19.9k stars; original inspiration for this project. Summary Cards is newer, TypeScript-based, with more themes; tipsy's project is older and maintains larger following.
1.6k stars; 3D contribution visualization niche. Summary Cards serves broader summary use case but with 2x adoption despite different market segment.